Wikipedia

Search results

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Solomon Star News: Solomon Islands' National Wharf at Stake


Wednesday, 06 November 2013 10:45 Solomon Star

BIG WHARF AT STAKE .

Is minister Seth Gukuna standing in the way of this multi-million dollar project?

SOLOMON Islands risked losing a proposed multi-million dollar wharf at Honiara’s international seaport because one government minister refused to cooperate with the donor.

Japan, which is funding the project, wanted Infrastructure minister Seth Gukuna to reinstate the Solomon Islands Ports Authority (SIPA) board he recently sacked.

This is so that they could fast-track project documents they need to sign with the board, submit the documents to the Japanese cabinet, which is meeting next month, for its final blessing, and allow work on the wharf to start mid next year.

“Time is not on our side,” explains Honiara-based Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) project formulation adviser, Naoko Laka.
“If the project documents fail to go before the Japanese cabinet next month, then the project will have to be delayed for another time,” Ms Laka said.

The wharf, which will cater mainly for overseas ships, will be 200 metres long, and will be built on the edge of the SIPA coastline, Point Cruz.

When completed it is expected to dramatically reduce waiting time for international ships that normally wait for up to four days in the harbour when the port is busy.

It is also expected to bring Honiara’s seaport to international standard.
But attempts by all those involved to get the project documents signed were not possible because Mr Gukuna has not cooperated.

An overseas team from JICA was here last month to sign documents with SIPA and the national government, but this could not happen because the board was already terminated.

The JICA team has since gone back to Japan, putting the project at greater risk.
Mr Gukuna sacked the SIPA board after it refused to act on his directive to reinstate William Barile, whom the board terminated earlier this year.

Mr Barile is now back at SIPA, but the Solomon Star understands he has no contract, has not been paid, and that SIPA officials are refusing to work with him.

The Solomon Star understands that Mr Gukuna has been asked to immediately reinstate the SIPA board so that the project documents can be signed and sent to Tokyo.

It was also understood that the Attorney General has advised both Mr Gukuna and the Finance minister Rick Hou to reinstate the board.
“While Mr Hou agreed to have the board reinstated, Mr Gukuna is refusing to cooperate,” a source from SIPA told the Solomon Star.
JICA is also understood to have written to Mr Gukuna about the importance of having a board in place and the urgency of signing the documents.
But Mr Gukuna has not responded to the letter.

Staff at Mr Gukuna’s office say the minister has not called into office for the past weeks.

The Solomon Star tried calling him on his mobile phone several times yesterday, but it was switched off.
He has not replied to an email sent to him.

Meanwhile, an official from SIPA said it would be a sad day for the organisation and the country if we lose the funding.

“SIPA has been waiting for 18 years for Japan to finally approve this project,” the official said.
“SIPA does not have the money to build a project of this size. The government does not have the money either.
“This is our opportunity. And remember opportunities don’t come often. That’s what this government must understand.

“If we lose this project, we may have to wait for another 18 years.
“If minister Gukuna is standing in the way of this project, the government must remove him immediately.
“He is an obstacle to development. He is not the kind of leader we want. He is putting his own vested interest before national interest.
“The nation needs to know about this type of minister and leader,” the SIPA official said.

By OFANI EREMAE
Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 4 hours ago
  • Willie Sau Kaitu'u and 2 others like this.
  • Sione Tuhaika This is pure political garbage! Solomon Star is waging a war against Lilo and his government Ministers in a very sinister way. They take talking points of the opposition and the so-called "civil society" which is made up of angry losers - including Maasina, FSII activists, and Anti-Corruption groups who are now taking full control of the responsibility of the opposition camp, and throw them out there for public consumption. This is a good example of this sinister plot: 
    First, the reporter claims that there was a group in Honiara to sign the documents but because the board had been fired and that SG didn't coop, they returned to Japan without it. 
    Second, the reporter claims that the board should be instated (which seems to be the main aim of the article), documents signed and then send to Japan? 
    Third, the reporter "assumes" the the AG advised Seth to instate the board members, but never validated that claim or interview the AG.
    Forth, the article is based one an anonymous source from SIPA, making its credibility a joke! 
    Firth, the reporter never indicated he reached out to Seth and the AG to have their side of the story. 
    I am not saying that Seth is right in his judgment, it just that reporters style of reporting is malicious in my opinion. 
    Political activism comes in many forms including misleading reporting, civil society teaming up with what should be an internal affairs of the government etc. and while I don't like Gukuna's style of leadership, the attack on him and Lilo by these reporters is dangerous.
    3 hours ago · Edited · Like · 1
  • Jason Saungongo japan need solomon islands n solomon need japan. am sure other country can step in should japan back off
    2 hours ago via mobile · Like
  • Too Pauq very cheap propaganda. does japan has to use its bilateral aid to interfere with the internal affairs of si? the power to appoint a new board is vested on the office of the minister, is it impossible to work with a new board?
    2 hours ago via mobile · Edited · Like · 1
  • Jerry Maiki Tengemoana There is two sides to the issue..project was initiated in 2005 and interestingly, it took 9 years for feasibility studies..a group was reported landed in Honiara to sign the papers...there are more info but not appropriate through this mode..typical solo media..
    2 hours ago · Unlike · 4
  • Spink Mahuta While we're left wondering about our MP's approach to halt this $$$$$$$-, let us not attach his Renbel attitude of leadership to this S. Islands development project. Lest we forget, he got his political cronies and Boss (Lilo) behind his back too. Can't anybody explain something why our MP's (Seth) big Boss did not raise a finger, since this sea-port is a golden break thru' for this country? I feel there is more in the back-yard than at the front gate. My view only.
  • Too Pauq i think its not reasonable to discuss it here as well cos there are many things abt this project we dont know
    46 minutes ago via mobile · Like · 1
  • Spink Mahuta TPQ- looks like your having a lot to say about this project and your holding something back, did you??? heheh!
  • Jerry Maiki Tengemoana my fear is we will end up argue over an issue that is more complex...let the responsible authorities deal with it..but if its of any interest to anyone then investigate and inform this forum...wharf issue aside, this case has exposed some weaknesses inthe current SOE Acts which might be of interest to some of our lawyers/law students in this forum if anyone interested to do a thorough research on and share legal findings...Media made alot of reference to the SOE Acts but i understand there is also a Ports Act exits..I've done a brief for our Board (confidential) and would appreciate to see other views/perspectives...happy to create a closed forum and share views..inbox me.